Publication Information
Frequency: Continuous
Format: PDF and HTML
Versions: Online (Open Access)
Year first Published: 2019
Language: English
Journal Menu |
Editorial Board |
Reviewer Board |
Articles |
Open Access |
Special Issue Proposals |
Guidelines for Authors |
Guidelines for Editors |
Guidelines for Reviewers |
Membership |
Fee and Guidelines |
Onchocerciasis Awareness and Treatment Strategies in Rural Southeast Nigeria
Okechukwu Odinaka Ajaegbu*
Department of Sociology, Imo state university, P.M.B. 2000, Owerri, Imo state, Nigeria
Received Date: April 03, 2020; Accepted Date: April 08, 2020; Published Date: April 15, 2020
*Corresponding author: Okechukwu Odinaka Ajaegbu, Department of Sociology, Imo state university, P.M.B. 2000, Owerri, Imo state, Nigeria. Tel: +2348064113068; Email: ajaegbuodina@yahoo.com
Citation: Ajaegbu OO (2020) Onchocerciasis Awareness and Treatment Strategies in Rural Southeast Nigeria. Adv in Pub Health, Com and Trop Med: APCTM-109.
Abstract
This study investigated onchocerciasis awareness and treatment strategies in rural southeast Nigeria. Social Cognitive Theory was used as theoretical framework. The study design is mixed methods research. Questionnaire and In-depth Interview was the study data collection instruments. For the qualitative data of the study, a total of 24 In-depth Interviews were conducted. Almost all the respondents have heard of onchocerciasis disease and more than half are aware that black fly is the vector that transmits the disease into human. Over one third of people in rural southeast Nigeria utilize traditional medicine/herbs to treat onchocerciasis disease. The study also found statistical significant positive correlation between onchocerciasis awareness level and use of ivermectin as the disease best treatment method. Finally the study clearly shows that as onchocerciasis awareness level continue to increase; many people tend to adopt ivermectin as the disease best treatment method in rural southeast Nigeria.
Keywords: Awareness; Nigeria; Onchocerciasis; Treatment strategies
Background
Onchocerciasis is a chronic parasitic disease caused by the micro filarial worms called onchocerca volvulus. This parasite is transmitted from man to man through the bites of the blackfly simulium of the family simulidae [1]. It is essentially a rural disease affecting communities sited along fast flowing rivers with manifestations particularly disturbing and incapacitating, often associated with long-term exposure to infections and this affects the social and economic activities of the occupants concerned.
The distribution of onchocerciasis is connected to the location of black flies which are normally found near fast running streams and waterways in the inter-tropical zones. Hence, huge percentage of the disease happens in Africa [2]. Onchocerciasis is also found in six countries in Latin America (Ecuador, Venezuela, Colombia, Brazil, southern Mexico, and Guatemala) and in Yemen in the Arabian Peninsula, where the disease is believed to be exported by the slave trade [2]. However, in July 2016, Guatemala became the fourth country in the world after Colombia (2013), Ecuador (2014), and Mexico (2015) was confirmed free of onchocerciasis after successful implementation of elimination activities for a considerable length of time [3]. Yet according to Okafor, Uzoka, Ajunwa, Chikezie Iyam and Dalla (2016) [4], onchocerciasis disease continue to persist in Africa and particularly in sub-Sahara; with over 99% of infected people in the world living in 31 countries in sub-Saharan Africa: Angola, Benin, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cameroon, Central African Republic, Chad, Republic of Congo, Côte d’Ivoire, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Ethiopia, Gabon, Ghana, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Kenya, Liberia, Malawi, Mali, Mozambique, Niger, Nigeria, Rwanda, Senegal, Sierra Leone, South Sudan, Sudan, Togo, Uganda, and United Republic of Tanzania [3].
Nigeria has the largest number of people with onchocerciasis, accounting for about a third of the global prevalence [5]; with 7 million people infected [4] and 50 million persons in over 40, 000 communities at risk (FMOH, 2017). According to the result of a study conducted by Umeh, Mohamoud, Hagan, Wilson, Okoye, Asana, Biritwum, Ogbu-Pearce, Elhassan, Yameogo, Braide and seketeli, (2010) [6] on prevalence and distribution of visual onchocerciasis in three ecological zones (Cross River, Taraba and Kogi) in Nigeria, onchocerciasis was the commonest single reason for visual impairment among participants; accounting for 30.2% of visual impairment in the study areas.
Unfortunately however, the level of awareness of the people about the aetiology, cause and method of transmission of the disease has consistently been a significant reason for worry in the control and prevention of onchocerciasis disease [7]. In a study conducted by Mubyazi, Barongo, Kamugisha, and Njunwa (2013) [8] in Tanzania, it was discovered that numerous people were not aware of the symptoms, signs, causes, and control measures of this disease. According to Ikpeze, Iwueze, and Ngenegbo (2014) [9], locals were aware of the disease and the blackfly but were not aware of the relationship between blackfly and onchocerciasis. This low awareness according to Ikpeze et al. (2014) [10] is the reason why complete elimination of the disease has not been successful in Nigeria. It is in the light of the foregoing that this study investigated level of onchocerciasis awareness and treatment strategies in rural southeast Nigeria.
Theoretical Review
The Social Cognitive Theory
Social Cognitive Theory (SCT) started as the Social Learning Theory (SLT) in the 1960s by Albert Bandura (Glanz & Rimer, 2002) [10]. It developed into the SCT in 1986 and posits that learning occurs in a social context with a dynamic and reciprocal interaction of the person, environment, and behaviour. The unique feature of SCT is the emphasis on social influence and its emphasis on external and internal social reinforcement. SCT considers the unique way in which individuals acquire and maintain behaviour, while also considering the social environment in which individuals perform the behaviour. The theory takes into account a person's past experiences, which factor into whether behavioural action will occur. These past experiences influence reinforcements, expectations, and expectancies, all of which shape whether a person will engage in a specific behaviour and the reasons why a person engages in that behaviour.
The goal of SCT is to explain how people regulate their behaviour through control and reinforcement to achieve goal-directed behaviour that can be maintained over time. The first five constructs (Reciprocal Determinism, Behavioural Capability, Observational Learning, Reinforcements and Expectations) were developed as part of the SLT; the construct of self-efficacy was added when the theory evolved into SCT.
This theory describes a dynamic, ongoing process in which personal factors, environmental factors, and human behaviour all interact. The theory asserts that individual onchocerciasis disease awareness level not only improve based on their own experiences, but by observing the actions of others and the benefits of those actions. Therefore the choice of onchocerciasis disease treatment method that will be adopted by an individual is a product of rational evaluation (awareness) of past implications of the disease and preventive methods.
Hypotheses
- There is a statistical significant difference between respondents’ age and awareness of onchochocerciasis best treatment methods in rural southeast Nigeria.
- There is a statistical significant relationship positive between respondents’ onchocerciasis awareness level and use of Ivermectin to treat the disease.
Methods
The study design is mixed methods research and was conducted in southeast Nigeria. Southeast Nigeria, which is made-up of five states (Abia, Anambra, Ebonyi, Enugu and Imo) with 95 Local Government Areas (Abia State has 17 LGAs; Anambra, 21; Ebonyi, 13; Enugu, 17; and Imo, 27) was be the study area. The area is predominantly made-up of Igbo speaking people. The culture of the people has been shaped primarily by its rainforest climate, its ancient trade, migration, and social history within its various clans and peoples, and with its ancient trading neighbours, allies and lately with Europeans.
The general population of the study is 24265421, being the projected 2018 population of southeast Nigeria. However, the target population for the study is 19,553 which were drawn from a population categories in the study area designed for an inclusive representation of relevant stakeholders in the study. They are members of: Community Farmers Cooperative, Community Men Town Union, Community Women Town Union, Community Men Youth and Community Women Youth. The study sample size is 1051. This was determined statistically using Taro Yamane formula. However, only 969 copies of questionnaire were retrieved. For the qualitative data of the study, a total of 24 In-depth Interviews were conducted. It was comprised of 3 Traditional title holders (one from each community), 3 Community men leaders (one from each LGA), 3 Community women leaders (one from each community), 3 Community youth leaders (one from each community) 3 Farmers (1 from each community), 3 Clergymen (one from each community), 3 Orthodox health practitioners (one from each community) and 3 Traditional health practitioners (one from each community). The multi stage sampling method was adopted for this study. Firstly, based on hydrological and epidemiological results, Southeast States was purposively selected due to the endemicity of onchocerciasis disease in many communities in the area. Secondly, based on the prevalence of onchocerciasis disease among States in Southeast Nigeria, purposive sampling method was adopted to select three (3) States (Enugu, Ebonyi and Imo). Thirdly, three LGAs namely, Oji-River, Ikwo and Okigwe were purposively selected from the three states based on the prevalence rate of onchocerciasis. Fourthly, purposive sampling method was used to select one community from each selected LGAs that have high onchocerciasis prevalence in the area. Thus, a total of three communities (Achi, Echia-Like and Amuru) were selected for the study. Furthermore, five population categories were created in the selected communities for inclusiveness of all relevant respondents in the study. Finally, the actual respondents were selected from the population categories using proportionate stratified random sampling method. For the qualitative data, purposive sampling method will be used to select key interviewees.
The study instruments for data collection were structured interview questionnaire and in-depth interview (IDI). Open ended and closed ended structured questions were administered to the respondents for the quantitative data of the study, while semi structured interview guide was used for the qualitative data. Research questionnaire was administered to respondents at their place of residents and their place of work with the help of research assistants. The in-depth interviews (IDI) were personally conducted by the researcher with the help of a research assistant who took notes. Interviewees’ responses were recorded with notebooks and audio tape recorders.
The quantitative data was processed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) and analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics. For the qualitative data, QDA Miner software was used in the analysis of the interview transcripts. Analysis started by transcribing the IDI data verbatim. Deductive themes and sub-themes were used as categories and sub-categories.
Results Table 1: Socio-Demographic Characteristics of the Respondents The study considered variables such as respondents’ Age, Sex, Education, Marital status, Religion and Occupation. Table 1 show that 502 (51.8%) of the respondents are females while 467 (48.2%) are males. The table also indicates that 268 (27.7%) of the respondents are aged between 18-29 years while only 107 (11.0%) are aged 66 years and above. In terms of educational level, the table shows that 240 (24.8%) respondents representing a majority of the study sample size have higher/tertiary education while only 141 (14.6%) of the respondents has no formal education. The table also indicates that a majority of the respondents 571 (58.9%) were married while only 24 (2.5%) respondents were divorced. The table further show that majority of the study respondents 420 (43.3%) practice farming/hunting as their occupation while 26 (2.7%) respondents were retirees. In terms of religion, the table shows that a majority of the respondents 720 (74.3%) are Christians while 53 (5.5%) representing minority of the respondents practice Islamic religion.
SEX
FREQUENCY
PERCENTAGE (%)
Male
467
48.2
Female
502
51.8
Total
969
100.0
AGE
18-29 years
268
27.7
30-41 years
237
24.5
42-53 years
199
20.5
54-65 years
158
16.3
66+
107
11.0
Total
969
100.0
EDUCATIONAL LEVEL
None
141
14.6
Vocational
184
19.0
Primary/FSLC
204
21.1
Secondary
200
20.6
Higher/Tertiary
240
24.8
Total
969
100.0
MARITAL STATUS
Single
286
29.5
Married
571
58.9
Divorced
24
2.5
Separated
38
3.9
Widowed
50
5.2
Total
969
100.0
OCCUPATION
Retired
26
2.7
Student
104
10.7
Farming/Hunting
420
43.3
Trading
211
21.8
Artisan
89
9.2
Paid Employment/Salaried
119
12.3
Total
969
100.0
RELIGION
Christianity
720
74.3
Traditional
196
20.6
Islam
53
5.5
Total
969
100.0
Questionnaire items and Response categories
Frequency
Percentage (%)
Heard of Onchocerciasis
Yes
804
83.0
No
165
17.0
Total
969
100.0
How can one contract onchocerciasis
Black fly bites
483
50.8
Contact with infected person
158
16.6
Punishment from the gods
202
21.3
Poor dietary habits
49
5.2
Unknown
10
1.1
Don’t know
48
5.1
Total
950
100.0
Onchocercisis Awareness Level
Very high
302
31.2
High
418
43.1
Don’t know
220
22.7
Low
8
.8
Very low
21
2.2
Total
969
100.0
How do you know infected person
Severe itching
216
22.3
Impaired sight
327
33.7
Rashes
112
11.6
Hanging groin
116
12.0
Swellings
180
18.6
Epilepsy
18
1.9
Total
969
100.0
Best Method of Treating Onchocerciasis
Traditional medicine/herbs
388
40.0
Prayer
121
12.5
Banocide
19
2.0
Ivermectin
414
42.7
Don’t know
27
2.8
Total
969
100.0
Table 2 shows that the respondents were asked whether they have heard of onchocerciasis disease before, 83.0% of the respondents said yes while 17.0% said no. This shows that many people in the study area are aware of the disease. This high level of awareness may not be unconnected to the years of creating awareness and distribution of ivermectin by government and donors in onchocerciasis endemic communities. In the IDI data, majority of the respondents also revealed that they have heard about the disease. A participant affirmed: “I have heard about it. There was a time they said that some people brought drugs for eye problem though I did not go” [Female, Age 57, Farmer, Imo State]. This was also corroborated by another participant who said: “Yes I know it. We call it “Isi anyaocha” [Male, Age 66, Farmer, Enugu State]. The respondent demonstrates his knowledge of the diseases by mentioning the Igbo name for the disease.
To enquire if the respondents are aware how one can contract onchocerciasis disease, the respondents were asked to identify ways people contract the disease. Majority (50.8%) of the respondents revealed that it is through black fly bites, 16.6% said it is through contact with infected person, 21.3% said it is as a result of punishment from the gods, 5.2% said it is caused by poor dietary habits, 1.1% of the respondents said the cause is not known, while 5.1% said they don’t know. The respondents were further asked to rate awareness level of onchocerciasis in their community. To this end, almost half of the respondents 418 (43.1%) rated high onchocerciasis awareness in their community while only 8 (.8%) respondents said it is low. This implies that many of the people are aware of onchocerciasis in their community.
With respect to how onchocerciasis infected persons can be identified, majority (33.7%) of the respondents revealed that infected persons experience visual impairment while 1.9% of the respondents said they experience epilepsy. This was corroborated in the IDI data. A respondent noted:....you have a very generic one which is sleepiness, tiredness, we know about fever, visual impairment and itching. The most prevalent symptom is the eye issue. Like I know a man who has this issue. [Male, Age 47, Clergy, Imo State]
In the words of another respondent: “Sometimes it causes body itching with white patches” [Female, Age 71, Farmer, Ebonyi State]. Another participant also identified the symptoms by saying: “I know it because any person it bites it causes rashes on the person’s body and if that person did not get treatment on time, that person may go blind later” [Male, Age 78, Herbalist, Enugu State].
Furthermore, a symptom not mention by the other participants was mentioned by one of the respondent who report some of the symptoms of onchocerciasis in these words: “The person may have severe skin itching. For some men, they may have hanging groin. Some also have visual impairment” [Female, Age 26, Student, Imo State].
The wide ranging symptoms of onchocerciasis identified by the respondents of different demographic backgrounds suggest that the rural dwellers are aware of the symptoms of the disease. In terms of awareness of best method of treating onchocerciasis infected persons,42.7% representing majority of the respondents revealed that ivermectin is the best treatment method, 40.0% of the respondents said that it is with traditional medicine or herbs, 12.5% said prayer, 2.0% noted benocide, , while 2.8% of the respondents said they don’t know.
Test of Hypotheses
Hypothesis 1
There is a statistical significant difference between respondents’ age and awareness of onchocerciasis best treatment methods in rural southeast Nigeria. To determine if there is a statistical difference between age and awareness of onchocerciasis best treatment method, Mann-Whitney U was conducted.
Ranks
Age
N
Mean Rank
Sum of Ranks
Rating of the use of treatment methods (Traditional medicine/herbs)
18-45years
620
475.81
295001.50
46years +
349
501.33
174963.50
Total
969
Rating of the use of treatment methods (Ivermectin)
18-45years
620
505.50
313412.50
46years +
349
448.57
156552.50
Total
969
Rating of the use of treatment methods (Prayer)
18-45years
620
495.25
307053.50
46years +
349
466.80
162911.50
Total
969
Rating of the use of treatment methods (Banocide)
18-45years
620
500.05
310030.00
46years +
349
458.27
159935.00
Total
969
Test Statisticsa
Traditional medicine/herbs
Ivermectin
Prayer
Banocide
Mann-Whitney U
102491.500
95477.500
101836.500
98860.000
Wilcoxon W
295001.500
156552.500
162911.500
159935.000
Z
-1.484
-3.281
-1.711
-2.322
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)
.138
.001
.087
.020
a. Grouping Variable: age
The data on table 3 show that there is no statistical significant difference between age and use of traditional medicine/herbs (U= 102491.5, P-value =.138) and prayer (U= 101836.5, P-value =.087). This means that there is no difference in the way those aged18-45 years and those aged old 46 years and above use traditional medicine/herbs and prayer to treat onchocerciasis symptoms. However, the data showed a statistical significant difference between age and use of ivermectin (U= 95477.5, P-value =.001) and banocide (U= 98860, P-value =.020). This shows that there is a difference in the way those aged18-45years and those aged old 46years and above use ivernectin and benocide to treat onchocerciasis disease. Furthermore from the rank section of table 3, it can be observed that Mean Rank of those aged 18-45 years who indicated ivermertin (505.50) and benocide (500.05) is higher than that of those aged 46 years and above (ivermectin-448.57, benocide-458.27). Therefore, it can be concluded that those aged 18-45 years are more likely to use ivermectin and benocide to treat onchocerciasis than those aged between 46 years and above.
Hypothesis 2
There is a statistical significant positive relationship between respondents’ onchocerciasis awareness level and use of Ivermectin to treat the disease. To investigate the relationship between respondents’ onchocerciasis awareness level and use of ivermectin, Spearman’s rho correlation test was conducted. Spearman's rho Heard of onchocercissis Rating of use of Ivermectin
Correlations
Heard of onchocercissis
Rating of use of Ivermectin
Correlation Coefficient
1.000
.108**
Sig. (2-tailed)
.
.001
N
969
969
Correlation Coefficient
.108**
1.000
Sig. (2-tailed)
.001
.
N
969
969
The data on table 4 shows a statistical significant positive correlation (P-value = .001, r = .108) between respondents level of onchocerciasis disease awareness and use of ivermectin. This means that as onchocerciasis awareness level of the people increases, they are more likely to use ivermectin to treat the disease.
Discussion
The study investigated onchocerciasis awareness and treatment strategies in rural southeast Nigeria. Findings from the study show that almost all the respondents have heard of onchocerciasis and more than half are aware that black fly is the vector that transmits the disease into human. This is an indication of high level of onchocerciasis awareness and the correlation between the disease and black flies in the study area. This was supported by data from the in-depth interview. However contrary to the findings of the research conducted on level of awareness of locals on onchocerciasis disease in Achiagu, Adani, Aguobuowa and Achi communities in Enugu State, Nigeria revealed that locals were aware of the disease and the black fly but were not aware of the association between them [8].
Using Mann-Whitney U test, the study established that there is no statistical significant difference between age and the choice of traditional medicine/herbs (U= 102491.5, P-value =.138) and prayer (U= 101836.5, P-value =.087). This means that there is no difference in the way those aged18-45 years and those aged old 46 years and above use traditional medicine/herbs and prayer to treat onchocerciasis disease. This implies that the use of traditional medicine/herbs and prayer cut across all age brackets in rural southeast Nigeria. However the study further found that there is a statistical significant difference between age and use of ivermectin (U= 95477.5, P-value =.001) and banocide (U= 98860, P-value =.020) as onchocerciasis treatment method. From the rank section of table 3, it can be observed that Mean Rank of those aged 18-45 years who indicated ivermertin (505.50) and benocide (500.05) is higher than that of those aged 46 years and above (ivermectin-448.57, benocide-458.27). Therefore, it can be concluded that those aged 18-45 years are more likely to use ivermectin and benocide to treat onchocerciasis disease than those aged between 46 years and above. This could be explained from the point of view that younger people are more susceptible to new ways of doing things due to education, globalization and technologies (phone, computer) that make information easily available and in the long run influence behaviour.
Though majority of the respondents favour the use of ivermectin as onchocerciasis disease best treatment method, it is observed that over one third of the people believe that traditional medicine/herbs are the disease best treatment methods. This shows that many people in rural southeast Nigeria believe in the potency of traditional medicine/herbs to cure onchocerciasis disease and this line of thought can negatively affect the disease treatment programmes in the rural southeast Nigeria.
Using Spearman’s rho correlation test, the study found statistical significant positive correlation between respondents’ onchocerciasis awareness level and use of ivermectin as the disease best treatment method. This means that as onchocerciasis awareness continue to rise, people tend to adopt ivermectin as the disease best treatment method in rural southeast Nigeria.
Conclusion
The study provided insight into onchocerciasis awareness level and treatment methods adopted among rural dwellers in southeast Nigeria. While the use of traditional medicine/herbs is high in rural southeast Nigeria, this study clearly show that as onchocerciasis awareness level continue to increase, many people tend to adopt ivermectin as the disease best treatment method.
Competing Interests Statement: Article/Work Title: Onchocerciasis awareness and treatment strategies in rural Southeast Nigeria
Author(s): Okechukwu Odinaka Ajaegbu
I declare that there is no competing financial, professional, or personal interests that might have influenced the performance or presentation of the work described in this manuscript.
References
- Ikpo AU, Mbanugo J, Anukwuorji CA (2016) Study on the Prevalence of Onchocerca volvulus Infection among the Inhabitants of Awgu and Oji-River Local Government Areas of Enugu State, Nigeria. International Journal of Tropical Disease & Health 18: 1-9.
- WHO (2015) Onchocerciasis (river blindness) - Disease Information.
- WHO (2016) Onchocerciasis. Fact sheet. Retrieved January 14, 2017, from http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs374/en/
- Okafor O, Uzoka NB, Ajunwa LO, Chikezie IC, Iyam OI, et al. (2016) Prevalence, Knowledge Attitude and Practices Associated with Onchocerciasis in Enugu East and Nkanu West Local Government Areas of Enugu State, Nigeria. Animal Research International 13: 2345-2351.
- WHO (2013) The importance of Onchocercial Skin Diseases. Retrieved September 12, 2015, from www.who.int/tdrpublications/tdr-research-publications/oncho-sk9indisease/en/index.html
- Umeh RE, Mohamoud AO, Hagan M, Wilson M, Okoye OI, et al. (2010) Prevalence and distribution of ocular onchocerciasis in three ecological zones in Nigeria. J. Med. Sci 39: 267-275.
- Kamalu NA, Uwakwe FE (2014) Evaluation of different Onchocerciass manifestation by age and gender among residents in selected endemic villages in Okigwe Local Government Area of Imo State, Nigeria 20: 139-150.
- Mubyazi GM, Barongo VK, Kamugisha ML, Njunwa Kato J (2013) Public Knowledge , Perceptions and Practices in Relation to Infectious and other Communicable Diseases in Tanzania : Lessons Learnt from Babati District 2: 1-12.
- Ikpeze OO, Iwueze MO, Ngenegbo UF (2014) Knowledge, attitude and practices of residents of Achiagu, Adani and Aguobuowa communities in Nigeria regarding river blindness. Inter J AgriBiosci 3: 115-119.
- Glanz K, Rimer BK (2002) Health behavior and health education: Theory, research, and practice (3rd ed). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
- (2017). River blindness: shifting from prevention to surveillance and elimination. Geneva. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/neglected_diseases/news/shifting_from_prevention_to_surveillance_elimination/en